Geometry Lesson Plan: Axioms, Theorems, The Nature Of Faith

Geometric Axioms (Postulates) vs Theorems: This simple classroom discussion exercise covers everything from religion to Non-Euclidean Geometry!

Home

Geometry, Axioms, And The Nature Of Faith

(Published in Directory : Mathematics : Geometry)

This article describes one of the most interesting classroom discussions I ever had in a geometry class. The discussion was based on a homework assignment regarding geometric postulates (also known as axioms).

Many students have a difficult time understanding the difference between axioms and theorems. How is an axiom different from a theorem?

The simple answer is that a theorem is something we "prove", while an axiom is something we accept without proof. In other words, axioms are things we are so utterly convinced of that we don't feel the need to prove them.

After we had a brief discussion on this idea, I gave my students a rather unusual homework assignment. I told them to make a list of several things which they accept as "axiomatic". I explained that these did not necessarily have to be related to mathematics, and of course, they all liked that.

The next day I asked each student to share one or more of their axioms. Their answers were very interesting, and included the following:

The sun will rise tomorrow

My parents love me

Even when I can't see them because of the clouds, the sun, moon and stars are still there

I'm going to get accepted to college
There is a God

There is no God

The last two items on the list were especially interesting, because on the question of the existence of God, we had students with diametrically opposed "axioms". I asked the students how their differing axioms about God affected the way they lived and acted. This produced some interesting contrasts:

I do/don't go to church

I do/don't pray

This physical existence is all we've got/Life is eternal

It was clear that there were fundamental differences in the belief systems and actions of these students, based on their fundamental difference in axioms.

This provided me the opportunity to discuss Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometry; Euclid had a set of axioms--things he accepted as true without proving them--and others, such as Gauss and Lobachevsky, had very different axioms, which resulted in different theorems, or proofs.

This exercise is valuable not just from a mathematical standpoint, but also from a general life experience standpoint; it forces students to examine the nature of their own beliefs about the universe, and to come to grips with the fact that their every action and behavior is based on a set of fundamental beliefs that they have accepted without proof. This revelation may shake some of them, but sometimes a little shaking is good.

I concluded the discussion with a quotation from the Bible which clearly defines the nature of an axiom. It is found in Hebrews 11:1.

Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.

About the Author

Name: Humphrey Nowlin

Recommended Resources

Math Wonders
History Of Mathematics
About These Resources

Recent Member Comments

Below you will find recent member comments about this article. To view all the user comments, please click here: Member Comments Page

zaphod wrote on Apr 19, 2005	quote options
that's an interesting idea that axioms are closely related to faith. i saw a different take on it though on another website another writer argued that axioms were really unrelated to faith because - and i quote - Math in itself is not intrinsically connected to the real world. in other words math is based on abstract constructs such as points lines planes etc and since these abstract constructs have no intrinsic connection to the real world it is not a matter of faith whether they behave according to certain rules in other words the axioms are nothing more than the rules of the game and we can make them whatever we want whattdya think?
Humphrey Nowlin wrote on Apr 21, 2005	quote options
Well, I do see the point on that. In a sense, mathematics is just a game we play with abstract concepts, and so axioms are nothing more than the rules by which we play the game. In another sense, however, I disagree. Because math - from a pragmatic sense - is typically valuable insofar as it is a model of the real world. In other words, Euclid didn't choose his postulates because he thought they would be an interesting intellectual exercise; he chose them because he believed they were an accurate model of the universe as he knew it.

View Comments Page

Search For More Information On The Internet

Use Google Safe-Search to find more information about this or other educational topics on the internet.

Home